NUL Logo
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
NUL Logo
  • Communities & Collections
  • Browse NULIR
  • English
  • Català
  • Čeština
  • Deutsch
  • Español
  • Français
  • Gàidhlig
  • Italiano
  • Latviešu
  • Magyar
  • Nederlands
  • Polski
  • Português
  • Português do Brasil
  • Suomi
  • Svenska
  • Türkçe
  • Tiếng Việt
  • Қазақ
  • বাংলা
  • हिंदी
  • Ελληνικά
  • Yкраї́нська
  • Log In
    New user? Click here to register.Have you forgotten your password?
  1. Home
  2. Browse by Author

Browsing by Author "Mothibeli, Kopang Pius"

Now showing 1 - 1 of 1
Results Per Page
Sort Options
  • Loading...
    Thumbnail Image
    ItemOpen Access
    The syntactic functions and structures of WH-and that-nominal clauses in English Language with reference to Animal farm by George Orwell
    (National University of Lesotho, 2022-07) Mothibeli, Kopang Pius;
    The present study analyses the syntactic functions and structures of Wh- and That-nominal clauses in English Language with reference to Animal Farm by George Orwell. The study employed documentary research method for data collection. The findings of the study show a total number of thirty four (34) Wh- and That-nominal clauses in the dialogue section. There are five (5) Wh- nominal clauses and a total of twenty nine (29) That-nominal clauses. The study concludes that the dialogue section reflects a wide range of That-nominal clauses relative to their Wh- counterparts. The study further demonstrates that the dialogue section of Animal Farm demonstrates a variety of syntactic functions and structures of Wh- and That-nominal clauses. The data illustrates four (4) syntactic functions, subject, object, adjective complement and appositive. The Wh-nominal clauses are indicated as subject and object while That-nominal clauses are observed as subject, object, adjective complement and appositive. The study thus illustrates that That-nominal clauses show more variety of syntactic functions than the Wh- ones. In the case of syntactic structures, the study indicates that That-nominal clauses reflect more varied syntactic structures than Wh- ones since That-nominal clauses demonstrate five syntactic structures while the Wh-nominal clauses show two structures

DSpace software copyright © 2002-2025 LYRASIS

  • Cookie settings
  • Privacy policy
  • End User Agreement
  • Send Feedback